what are the disadvantages of the database approach by comparing with a file processing system ??
very few that I can think of. I’ve built apps both ways, and managing data in flat files as opposed to a relational database is much more cumbersome.
Seriously Dude…read a book, goto the microsoft website etc. This stuff is easy to Google. Sounds like you want people to answer a study question that you yourself should be learning about.
Try looking at the Microsoft patterns and Practices site for guidance on Tier based development or books like Rocky Lhotkas on CSLA development
It appears that the question period has expired. If you have received an answer that meets your needs, please choose one of those as a ‘best answer.’ If you haven’t received a good answer for your question, you may want to consider the following,
1) Re-post your question. Newer questions get more activity on Yahoo! Answers than old ones.
2) If you do re-post your question, consider why it wasn’t answered the first time. Could it be more specific? Could it be worded better? Were there grammatical or spelling errors? Was it in the best category?
If it doesn’t seem likely that re-posting your question will help you, then here’s a listing of my favorite ‘answer sites’. Maybe one of them will help you.
Answers.com http://www.answers.com/
Bartleby http://www.bartleby.com/
Yahoo Reference http://education.yahoo.com/reference/
HowStuffWorks http://www.howstuffworks.com/
Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
Since I really haven’t answered your question, it is not necessary to give me any points. Regards.
For my world war two history project. I have to do it in french.
How would you say "Beam Approach Training"?
This is what the beam approach beacon system is, for context:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_Approach_Beacon_System
Thanks!
You are on the right way to find the solution:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial%3ASearch&search=Beam+Approach+Beacon+System&fulltext=Rechercher
Bonne chance!
For my world war two history project. I have to do it in french.
How would you say "Beam Approach Training"?
This is what the beam approach beacon system is, for context:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_Approach_Beacon_System
Thanks!
You are on the right way to find the solution:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial%3ASearch&search=Beam+Approach+Beacon+System&fulltext=Rechercher
Bonne chance!
is closer to the working of human cognition? If yes then how? If not then why? Support
your answer with strong arguments and real life examples. ‘
Do your own homework! You didn’t even say please! How rude!
You’ll get some free download-able e-Books on Operating Systems for Dummies at the links given below.
All the best.
ST
"software system integration used at Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) is ….. considered necessary and sufficient to demonstrate completion of each …"
"An approach to software system integration used at Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) is described and compared with established approaches to system integration. The approach presented here is evolutionary in nature: system functions are integrated and demonstrated to the customer in a series of successive system increments referred to as “Builds”. The order of integration is essentially top-down with vertical slicing, i.e., functional capabilities are demonstrated to the customer only when both high-level control functions and underlying low-level services have been integrated. This paper presents the first reported detailed case study of the application of the Build approach to the development of an actual system."
It should have been sufficient for the application to be integrated, so my problem is why where their so many problems and why weren’t they picked up, maybe a few red herring thrown in to addle the less learned of the group 
"software system integration used at Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) is ….. considered necessary and sufficient to demonstrate completion of each …"
"An approach to software system integration used at Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) is described and compared with established approaches to system integration. The approach presented here is evolutionary in nature: system functions are integrated and demonstrated to the customer in a series of successive system increments referred to as “Builds”. The order of integration is essentially top-down with vertical slicing, i.e., functional capabilities are demonstrated to the customer only when both high-level control functions and underlying low-level services have been integrated. This paper presents the first reported detailed case study of the application of the Build approach to the development of an actual system."
It should have been sufficient for the application to be integrated, so my problem is why where their so many problems and why weren’t they picked up, maybe a few red herring thrown in to addle the less learned of the group
iv been asked by my teacher to find out what ” what is the event. division approach in operating system.? ” and i cant seem to find any links..or what is it.,, i would prefer if u explain..rather than a link.. but anythin will do thnks
I worked on an Operating System that was "Event Driven". basically it means the OS call routines depending on what the event is. If their are no events going on the CPU just does some idle stuff like adding ones and zeros while waiting for an Interrupt(event)